Fatwa on Suicide Bombing in Sharia Maqāṣid View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64016/parewasaraq.v1i2.12Keywords:
Fatwa, Suicide Bombing , Sharia MaqāṣidAbstract
The legal methodology of halalizing suicide bombings through fatwas has become a very worrying problem to date, making some people affected by the fatwa suicide bombing. This article aims to identify the basis for suicide bombing fatwas. This study discusses the methodology used by clerics to legalize suicide bombings. The controversial phenomenon of suicide bombings within the framework of Islamic law requires an approach based on the main principles of Sharia Maqāṣid. The main purpose of Islamic law is to protect the five fundamental maqāṣid (purposes): religion, soul, reason, heredity, and property. In this context, fatwas on suicide bombings have given rise to various views among Muslim religious scholars and thinkers. This type of research uses a type of qualitative research with library research methods that take from journal books and other books or we know as descriptive qualitative research types. Through a descriptive-analytical approach, this study outlines the arguments used by opinions that consider suicide bombing as a form of legitimate struggle and opinions that reject it as a violation of humanitarian and religious principles. The results showed that opinions that saw suicide bombings as an act that violated the principles of Sharia Maqāṣid were more strongly supported. These actions threaten key values such as the protection of life and reason, and disrupt the harmony of society. Although the arguments of supporters of suicide bombings often refer to extreme situations and occupation, Sharia Maqāṣid analysis shows that such goals do not justify the sacrifice of innocent lives. Fatwas on suicide bombings must be assessed through the lens of Sharia Maqāṣid in order to understand their impact on the main objectives of Islamic law. Views that promote human, peaceful, and just values are more consistent with the principles of Sharia Maqāṣid, while views that justify acts of indiscriminate violence should be examined more deeply in the context of their legitimacy and implications for society and religion as a whole.
References
Akbar, H., & Sastrawati, N. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Konvensi Internasional Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Perempuan. SIYASATUNA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’iyyah, 2(3), 665–677.
Al-Zuhaily, W. (1989). al-Fiqh al-Islamiy wa Adillatuhu. In Juz VII. Dar Al-Fikr.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (2011). Fiqih Islam wa adillatuhu. In Abdul Hayyie al-Kattani. Gema Insani.
Bakry, M. (2009). Fiqh Prioritas; Konstruksi Metodologi Hukum Islam Dan Kompilasi Kaidah Prioritas Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Mapan.
Departemen Agama, R. I. (2001). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Kompilasi Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Kelembagaan Agama Islam.
Elyana, E., & Ma’rifah, B. R. (2017). Penggunaan Sholawat Wahidiyah Sebagai Mahar Pernikahan (Analisis Kitab Sa’adatuddaraini karya Syaikh Yusuf Ismail An Nabhani). AL MUNAZHZHARAH: Jurnal Hukum, Pemikiran Dan Keislaman, 1(1), 36–46.
Fiqriadi, M. Z. (2021). Pandangan masyarakat tentang mahar bertingkat dalam perkawinan perempuan muslim Sasak di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. UIN Mataram.
Ghazaly, H. A. R. (2019). Fiqh munakahat. Prenada Media.
Ghozali, A. R. (2008). Fiqh Munakahat. cet. III. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Jawad, M. M. (2007). Fiqih lima mazhab. Jakarta: Lentera.
Kafi, A. (2020). Mahar Pernikahan Dalam Pandangan Hukum Dan Pendidikan Islam. PARAMUROBI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.32699/PARAMUROBI.V3I1.1436
Kaharuddin. (2015). Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Perkawinan: Menurut Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Mulia Wacana Media.
Kohar, A. (2016). Kedudukan Dan Hikmah Mahar Dalam Perkawinan. ASAS: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 8(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.24042/ASAS.V8I2.1245
Marnis, S., Thamrin, H., & Khotimah. (2019). Pernikahan Dalam Islam Dan Katolik. TOLERANSI: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama, 11(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.24014/TRS.V11I1.8290
Muslim, M., & Ja’far, A. K. (2019). Perundang-Undangan Keluarga Islam Dan Cedaw Dalam Menjamin Hak-Hak Kekeluargaan Islam. ASAS: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 11(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.24042/ASAS.V11I2.5604
Musyahid, A. (2019). Diskursus Maslahat Mursalah di Era Milenial; Tinjauan Filosofis terhadap Konsep Maslahat Imam Malik. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V1I2.10625
Peunoh, D. (2013). Hukum Perkawinan Islam, Suatu Studi Perbandingan dalam Kalangan Ahlus-Sunnah dan Negara-negara Islam (I). Bulan Bintang.
Qayyum, A. R., & Ekasari, R. (2020). Pemahaman Masyarakat terhadap Kedudukan Sunrang di Kecamatan Pallangga Kab. Gowa; Studi Perbandingan Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 2(1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I1.14294
Ramadani, L. (2016). Pengaruh penggunaan kartu debit dan uang elektronik (E-Money) terhadap pengeluaran konsumsi mahasiswa. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 8(1), 1–8.
Sahrani, M. A. T. dan S. (2009). Fikih Munakahat. Rajawali Press.
Setyowati, R. (2020). Konsep Mahar Dalam Perspektif Imam Syafi’i dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Isti`dal : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.34001/ISTIDAL.V7I1.2110
Soemiyati. (1982). Hukum Perkawinan Islam Perkawinan, Undang-Undang. Liberty.
Suryadin. (2017). Seserahan Co’i Nika (Biaya Nikah) Pada Masyarakat Manggelewa Dompu Dan Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadapnya. Schemata: Jurnal Pasca Sarjana IAIN Mataram, 6(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.20414/SCHEMATA.V6I2.845
Suseno, S. (2002). Uang, Pengertian, Penciptaan dan Peranannya dalam Perekonomian. Jakarta: PPSK BI.
Syarifudin, A. (2009). Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. In Jakarta: Kencana.
Toyibah, W., Ixbal Maulana, V., Fauzi, M., Sunan Ampel Surabaya, U., & Dayah Raudhah Tahfizh Al-Quran, I. (2022). Synonyms Analysis of Nakaha and Zawaja in the Al-Qur’an. Journal of Arabic Language Studies and Teaching (JALSAT), 2(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.15642/JALSAT.V2I1.122
Wijaya, A. (2015). Cara Memahami Maqashid Al- Syari’ah. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 4(2), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.24252/AD.V4I2.1487
Zed, M. (2004). Metode peneletian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hannani, Reza Damaisar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Parewa Saraq agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Parewa Saraq right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract Views: 94
| 
File Views: 8
